GLP & GLR Opinions

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Charlie-49ers » Sun Sep 19, 2021 4:59 pm

This is NOT another discussion thread like the other one. I want your opinion. There is a proposal on the table to modify the number of GLP and GLR plays both offense and defense.

Proposal: Require a minimum of three (3) GLP and three (3) GLR offensive plays, and reduce the required number of GLP & GLR defenses from four (4) to three (3) each.

All I want to see here is a "YES" for in favor or a "NO" against.
Image

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Charlie-49ers » Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:00 pm

49ers YES
Image

User avatar
Steve-LA Chargers
Posts: 1185
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Steve-LA Chargers » Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:06 pm

NO :twisted:
Los Angeles Chargers
2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL

User avatar
Mitch-Oilers
Posts: 1232
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:11 am

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Mitch-Oilers » Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:59 pm

Fine either way...
AFC West Champion 2038, 2039, 2041, 2043, 2044
AFC Champion 2043

User avatar
Jerry-Redskins
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:02 pm
Location: Sumter SC

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Jerry-Redskins » Sun Sep 19, 2021 6:06 pm

Yes.

Teams are now using GLP and GLR in the same situations as RL and PS. This is not inside the 5 yard line, but all yardages. The play calls increased for PG by @ 66% the past season and RG @35% . Only having two play calls has allowed the ability to isolate a single 100% successful play in multiple instances. If the play category can and is called in the same circumstances, they should have the same minimum amounts. There is no reason to use RL or PS in the same situations. The PNFL has always been different than all the other sim leagues I have played in. Those had teams call only a couple of plays on offense and defense with no ability to react in game as sim leagues. I won a ton in those leagues, but do not want to emulate that capability or style in the PNFL. We did the same for PRZ when the play calls increased dramatically. I do not want to play in a league like that ever again. It is what makes this league more difficult and more fun.

The minimums established exist to have somewhat varied plans and not allow teams to call the same play over and over. This was not a problem in the past as teams mostly only used the GL plays for their named situations. That begin the change and evolved a lot last season. i would expect it to grow even more as the PNFL just like our name sake NFL is a copy cat league. Setting a profile to 83% means a play will have a 41.5% chance of being called with a minimum of two. The 100% successful timed pass play can be called 41.5% of the time. Some say, well build a defense to stop it. OK, I have to build 4 different plays in the same category to stop it. Oh and the same D play has to consider defending the whole field to the goal line since PM and PLR can be called as well. All the original proposal was doing is having the GL plays match the minimum for the other situational calls such as RL, RR, PLR, and PRZ have the same minimum. It is also a discretionary category.

The proposal would have zero affect on play calls and only match and balance the minimum play calls while maintaining the on going spirit of the PNFL rules
2013, 2036 PNFL Champion

Image

User avatar
Justin-Chicago
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:15 am
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Justin-Chicago » Sun Sep 19, 2021 7:30 pm

Charlie-49ers wrote:This is NOT another discussion thread like the other one.

All I want to see here is a "YES" for in favor or a "NO" against.


That's just for Jerry :lol:

Cardinals vote YES
Image

User avatar
Dean-Atlanta
Posts: 1447
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:46 pm
Location: Lynnwood, WA

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Dean-Atlanta » Sun Sep 19, 2021 10:06 pm

I say NO to this and instead limit GLR/GLP to inside the 5 and 3rd and 1, 4th and 1 downs.
Dean
The Atlanta Falcons

"We may win big or lose big, but we don't dodge anybody and we don't makes excuses when we lose."
- Jerry Glanville

User avatar
Jerry-Redskins
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:02 pm
Location: Sumter SC

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Jerry-Redskins » Mon Sep 20, 2021 2:15 pm

I obviously did not read the fine print :oops:
2013, 2036 PNFL Champion

Image

tmurph-Jets
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:48 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby tmurph-Jets » Mon Sep 20, 2021 3:00 pm

Jets vote Yes
Image

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Re: GLP & GLR Opinions

Postby Charlie-49ers » Mon Sep 20, 2021 4:21 pm

Jerry-Redskins wrote:I obviously did not read the fine print :oops:


Obviously
Image


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests