Attribute Changes

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Attribute Changes

Postby Charlie-49ers » Fri Dec 06, 2019 10:54 am

If we are going to do this, let's do it in this off-season! Post your ideas here and we will debate through it.
Image

User avatar
Jerry-Redskins
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:02 pm
Location: Sumter SC

Re: Attribute Changes

Postby Jerry-Redskins » Fri Dec 06, 2019 1:42 pm

I think the principle is to have a the players more varied themselves in distribution rather than changing the attributes themselves. The results on the field seem to be good. Just too many players close to the top. That is getting better I think. The last few drafts are not nearly as deep. and the best player at a position may be quite a bit down from the top.
2013, 2036 PNFL Champion

Image

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Re: Attribute Changes

Postby Charlie-49ers » Fri Dec 06, 2019 6:13 pm

In case you had not noticed, I started a new algorithm two seasons ago with a couple of results: first, no more than two players at each position have POTs that rank in the top 25 in the League, and the second of those two are close to the 25th position; second, some POTs actually come in at the max, which allows a few Rookies to be starters (after Training Camp). I will tweak the differentials a little more this Draft.

BTW, the older Vets make for compression at the top positions. :idea: The idea of allowing each team a maximum of one or two players to protect their attributes and or unretire is a good idea. Better still, you are allowed two players, which can be attribution protection, unretire, or one of each.
Image

Rich-League Officer
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:16 pm
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Attribute Changes

Postby Rich-League Officer » Fri Dec 06, 2019 9:31 pm

Charlie, I know you and Jerry have begun the process with the drafts but it's not quite enough.
In a perfect world, all teams CBs speed would look something like this...
83-82-80-79-77-76-74 (players could and would still have high pots)
Same for all attributes across all positions.
A clear CB#1 #2 #7 ect
Wide variety of attributes.
We see in the min max table a huge spread of attributes that we all have ignored.
Players drafted into our league basically have 90%+++ of their total attribute points.
But I am aware that is impossible to achieve what I envision the way our drafts, anti aging, and unretirement rules are.
It's nearly impossible. Or it would take 10-15 seasons or 5-8 real years.

So while I fully agree with the attribute issue, It would require rule changes that many might hate.
Image

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Re: Attribute Changes

Postby Charlie-49ers » Sat Dec 07, 2019 5:57 pm

Charlie-49ers wrote:In case you had not noticed, I started a new algorithm two seasons ago with a couple of results: first, no more than two players at each position have POTs that rank in the top 25 in the League, and the second of those two are close to the 25th position; second, some POTs actually come in at the max, which allows a few Rookies to be starters (after Training Camp). I will tweak the differentials a little more this Draft.

BTW, the older Vets make for compression at the top positions. :idea: The idea of allowing each team a maximum of one or two players to protect their attributes and or unretire is a good idea. Better still, you are allowed two players, which can be attribution protection, unretire, or one of each.


BTW, the other thing that I do is key on the NFL first round! If they draft eigh CBs in the 1st round, then you are going to have more good CBs for two seasons (four in the first PNFL draft and four in the second PNFL draft) for that NFL draft year. For example, usually I only have one really good DT each Draft. This year the NFL took six in the 1st Round and seven DEs. So, there will be a lot of good DLs in this last and next Draft. Only one CB in the 1st round, but a bunch is the 2nd. CBs will be thin in our upcoming Draft, etc., etc., etc.
Image


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests