Using GPT 3.5 the neural network machine learning model, I primed it by loading all the rookie attributes and was then able to retrieve various analytical queries about the attribute data, one of the simplest was positional ranking based off different attribute ratings of the rookie pool.
Here are some of the returned queries for some of the requested rankings for positional players. Interesting read, of course the weighted queries provide different rankings. You can see the weights I used in the query:
GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
- Shawn-Giants
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:27 pm
- Mitch-Oilers
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:11 am
Re: GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
This is really cool! The way I rank players for my draft generated very similar rankings for WR. My S rankings didn't match quite as close. Here are my draft board rankings for WR and S this year:
WR
Williams
Pickens
Burks
Watson
Pierce
Shakir
I have Cine as my top S and Hamilton #2. We did agree on Brisker at #5, but I have the other S on this list ranked much lower.
WR
Williams
Pickens
Burks
Watson
Pierce
Shakir
I have Cine as my top S and Hamilton #2. We did agree on Brisker at #5, but I have the other S on this list ranked much lower.
AFC West Champion 2038, 2039, 2041, 2043, 2044
AFC Champion 2043
AFC Champion 2043
- Shawn-Giants
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:27 pm
Re: GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
Thanks Mitch. Both Cine and Hamilton off Max ratings by 3 points each, ST which I think is very important for Safeties, Cine is at Max 94 there are receivers stronger than that being made lately with Max 66 so for the -2 hit in ST, I rank Hamilton higher as did the GPT with the key ratings for S being SP AC AG ST HA EN IN for me. Just personal preference.
- Jerry-Redskins
- Posts: 1358
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:02 pm
- Location: Sumter SC
- Jerry-Redskins
- Posts: 1358
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:02 pm
- Location: Sumter SC
Re: GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
My rankings:
Jacksonville Lewis Cine 0 S
Atlanta Bryan Cook 0 S
New York N Kyle Hamilton 0 S
Indianapolis Jaquan Brisker 0 S
Jacksonville Lewis Cine 0 S
Atlanta Bryan Cook 0 S
New York N Kyle Hamilton 0 S
Indianapolis Jaquan Brisker 0 S
2013, 2036 PNFL Champion
- Steve-LA Chargers
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm
Re: GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
This was super cool. Thanks for sharing. I had Cine at the top of my safety board though. No way I had a shot at him though.
Los Angeles Chargers
2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL
2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL
- Matt-Jacksonville
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 8:58 pm
- Location: South Texas
Re: GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
I've always been more of a coverage (FS) type person than a run support S person. So the ST didn't impact me as much.
- Shawn-Giants
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:27 pm
Re: GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
Welcome @Steve
@Matt, I hear you, but for me a safety is usually 10-15 yards off the ball so they are already in the deep third of the field so a point off MAX speed isn't going to show great drop off, however the 94 MAX Strength thing doesn't give him a first round grade for me, when 7th round WR's are coming in with 66 MAX ST. A Safety is just that, last in line of defense, I need them to have MAX strength and preferably MAX IN and DI, like a QB preference. I'll take the -1 SP to have MAX ST,IN,DI
@Matt, I hear you, but for me a safety is usually 10-15 yards off the ball so they are already in the deep third of the field so a point off MAX speed isn't going to show great drop off, however the 94 MAX Strength thing doesn't give him a first round grade for me, when 7th round WR's are coming in with 66 MAX ST. A Safety is just that, last in line of defense, I need them to have MAX strength and preferably MAX IN and DI, like a QB preference. I'll take the -1 SP to have MAX ST,IN,DI
- Matt-Jacksonville
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 8:58 pm
- Location: South Texas
Re: GPT 3.5 Rookie Analyzation
I get it. Just have a different preference. Who knows, long term Hamilton may end up having the better career. lol
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 137 guests