Attribute Talk

[Jerry-Redskins]

Which Guard do you draft first:

A
66 68 69 96 57 86 92 94
68 69 71 97 59 87 96 96

B
68 68 70 97 57 83 89 94
70 69 70 97 60 84 93 96

C
67 69 70 96 58 86 96 91
70 69 70 96 61 86 96 95

D
70 67 71 96 58 84 92 94
70 69 71 97 58 85 93 96

[Dan-Cincinnati]

All OL I look for AC, ST, EN first. Then AG, SP next. As long as their HA, IN, DI aren’t AWFUL, I don’t even factor that in.

[Mitch-Oilers]

@Jerry - it depends on what my current roster depth looked like and how quickly I needed him to start.

Without running these ratings through my formulas, I'd likely pick "C" if I needed someone to contribute quickly.

The reason why is because he has good endurance and rated very high and is already at his max in many important categories. I could get his SP rating to 1 point below his max in just one TC.

[Dan-Cincinnati]

D

Which Guard do you draft first:

A
66 68 69 96 57 86 92 94
68 69 71 97 59 87 96 96

B
68 68 70 97 57 83 89 94
70 69 70 97 60 84 93 96

C
67 69 70 96 58 86 96 91
70 69 70 96 61 86 96 95

D
70 67 71 96 58 84 92 94
70 69 71 97 58 85 93 96

[Mitch-Oilers]

While I have some time this afternoon, I'm going to create a few PNFL mirror leagues and do some experiments. I'll give every team the same PPPs and turn off injuries. Here are the controls:

League 1 - no changes to ratings
League 2 - only drop EN actuals by 10%
League 3 - only drop IN and DI actuals by 10%
League 4 - drop EN, IN and DI actuals by 10%

All positions will be impacted in the changes

I'll post results later today to see what, if any, changes in these "non-physical" ratings have on outcomes.

[Mitch-Oilers]

OK... I played out a 14 game season with both my control league and my league with 10% lower EN.

I used the base New England PPP used during the season for all teams.

Here are a few results:

Top 5 QBRs - Control league/Lower EN league
MIN - 99/NO - 102
CHI - 97/WASH - 97
NYA - 96/JAX - 93
DET - 95/NE - 92
PHI - 94/CHI - 91

Bottom 5 QBRs - Control league/Lower EN league
SF - 85/PHI - 85
CAR - 85/DET - 83
GB - 84/KC - 81
NYN - 83/CIN - 79
NO - 78/NYN - 78

Top 5 Rush Avg - Control league/Lower EN league
SF - 4.9/JAX - 4.8
OAK - 4.6/OAK - 4.6
CAR - 4.4/CAR - 4.6
KC - 4.3/WASH - 4.3
DET - 4.3/PHI - 4.3

Bottom 5 Rush Avg - Control league/Lower EN league
NE - 3.8/MIN - 4.1
NO - 3.8/GB - 4.0
LA - 3.7/CIN - 4.0
WASH - 3.6/CHI - 3.6
NYN - 3.2/DET - 3.0

Top 5 Scoring - Control league/Lower EN league
CHI - 390/MIN - 407
LA - 386/JAX - 404
NYA - 385/OAK - 399
MIN - 376/NE - 388
NE - 373/NO - 379

Bottom 5 Scoring - Control league/Lower EN league
GB - 323/PHI - 339
CIN - 305/LA - 337
NYN - 297/NYN - 295
NO - 296/CIN - 295
JAX - 293/DET - 273

[Steve-LA Chargers]

LB: SP AC AG ST EN must have 80 pot in AG or no contract. LB Correa has 79 was a FA pickup at a time I needed another LB

Based on the recent LB picks made by GB and SF in the 5th round, they clearly disagree on AG "must have 80 pot in AG or no contract" if the LB has 76 SP pot or 83 ST pot.