Illegal Plays On Defense

User avatar
Jerry-Redskins
Posts: 1494
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:02 pm
Location: Sumter SC

Re: Illegal Plays On Defense

Postby Jerry-Redskins » Sun Jul 27, 2025 6:21 am

Historically, we have either grandfathered things in or updated the plays at the time of the rule change. If there are a couple of egregious things, then make a tweak or resave to the right category to only that piece. Otherwise, as noted above, is it an issue?
2013, 2036 PNFL Champion

Image

Steve-Buffalo Bills
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm

Re: Illegal Plays On Defense

Postby Steve-Buffalo Bills » Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:23 am

Most of the plays listed are Dean's plays. He can fix most of this list by submitting a renamed and recategorized version of the offending play along with a compliant version of the originally named play.

For example, he can submit two plays to fix AT32rlG1 (lacks 5 in run focused def)
AT32rlG1 - edited so at least 5 in run focused def
AT32psG1 - original play with no edits resaved to its correct category and renamed for that category

If you guys would like, I can do this for these plays which are no longer 'owned.'
DN23PM09 - 2 men def LOS
BB3RM002 - lacks 6 in run focused def
JJ31rmNY - pass rush not run rush
JJ33rmMR - lacks 6 in run focused def
BB3RR008 - lacks 7 in run focused def
BUFFALO BILLS
PNFL 2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions (LA Chargers)
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 881
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Re: Illegal Plays On Defense

Postby Charlie-49ers » Sun Jul 27, 2025 12:05 pm

Do the unowned. Let Dean work on the other two. I do not want to reclassify plays where we need to delete something! Invariably, one or more people forget to delete items, and we end up with "Play Not Found" in PPPs, which only slows everything down.
Image

Steve-Buffalo Bills
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm

Re: Illegal Plays On Defense

Postby Steve-Buffalo Bills » Sun Jul 27, 2025 12:28 pm

JJ33rmMR is legal. It has 6 RUN FOCUSED players and no more than 5 DBs which satisfy the requirement to be categorized as RM.

DN23PM09 can only be fixed by making one more player defend the LOS. We can't recategorize the current version unless we reduce the LOS defense minimum to 2 for PL and/or PRD. Then it's a simple matter of creating a copy and saving as DN23PL09 or DN23PRD09. Can't do anything about this except overwrite it to comply.

I'll submit the other three for review:

BB3RM002 - lacks 6 in run focused def
original saved as BB3PS002 - original named play edited to ensure 6 players defend the LOS, does not exceed 5 DBs, and bump at line is compliant with league limits

JJ31rmNY - pass rush not run rush
original saved as JJ31pmNY - original named play edited to ensure 6 players defend the LOS, does not exceed 5 DBs, and bump at line is compliant with league limits

BB3RR008 - lacks 7 in run focused def
original saved as BB3PM008 - original named play edited to ensure 7 players defend the LOS, does not exceed 4 DBs, and bump at line is compliant with league limits
BUFFALO BILLS
PNFL 2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions (LA Chargers)
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests