Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

User avatar
Steve-LA Chargers
Posts: 1185
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm

Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

Postby Steve-LA Chargers » Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:42 pm

This is proposed regardless if we keep the cap or not:

RULE PROPOSAL:
- Any player traded automatically gets a +1 contract year. This is particularly beneficial for any player traded between the Superbowl and Free Agency.
- If the player is past their automatic anti-age and they are traded after the Superbowl and before the next season button push, the player is automatically anti-aged.
- If the player is past their automatic anti-age (and we still have the cap system), the receiving team only pays 50% of the salary.

My reasoning is this incentivizes trades. It also saves the receiving team 5.5 points if they acquire a player past their automatic anti-age before the next season button push.
Los Angeles Chargers
2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL

Dan-Cincinnati
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:38 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

Postby Dan-Cincinnati » Fri Feb 11, 2022 5:55 am

I would probably vote no on this. Not sure if this was posted before or after the salary cap decision, but Without a salary cap there isn’t much need for it
Image

User avatar
Mitch-Oilers
Posts: 1232
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:11 am

Re: Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

Postby Mitch-Oilers » Fri Feb 11, 2022 10:18 am

I like the concept, but I agree with Dan with the recent changes.

I believe a greater differentiation in ratings will drive more trading.
AFC West Champion 2038, 2039, 2041, 2043, 2044
AFC Champion 2043

User avatar
Steve-LA Chargers
Posts: 1185
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm

Re: Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

Postby Steve-LA Chargers » Fri Feb 11, 2022 1:26 pm

Recent changes have no bearing on this. So, you'd rather keep posting unsigned veterans on trading blocks after the Superbowl who get no interest and if they do always get meh offers? You'd rather spend 5.5 points to sign and anti-age them? Even if we only make this apply between the Super Bowl and Free Agency, it gets a bunch of unsigned non-veterans one year deals or extensions on their current deals? This wouldn't motivate anyone to trade more? OK
Los Angeles Chargers
2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL

User avatar
Justin-Chicago
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:15 am
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

Postby Justin-Chicago » Fri Feb 11, 2022 1:39 pm

Artificially Incentivizing trading is the last thing we should be doing. A trade should benefit both teams on its own merits. I believe excess trading will hurt the league.
Image

tmurph-Jets
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:48 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

Postby tmurph-Jets » Fri Feb 11, 2022 3:27 pm

Not a fan of creating contract years out of thin air.
There could be abuse of teams moving players around just to get the free contract and anti aging.
I think the cap lift is all you need.
And I see Stanley has a new team so it worked. :)
Image

User avatar
Steve-LA Chargers
Posts: 1185
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm

Re: Rule Proposal: Add trade incentives

Postby Steve-LA Chargers » Sat Feb 12, 2022 11:35 am

Rule proposal withdrawn
Los Angeles Chargers
2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests