Draft Idea
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 5:52 pm
Re: Draft Idea
I am for more information not less. THis would seriously decrease the value of draft picks. Grades would be based on Rich's value not ours so not really scouting.
-
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:16 pm
- Location: Gilbert, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Draft Idea
That's not true.
Grades would be based on the players exact potential.
For example, A grade in SP for WR would mean he has 83 or 84 speed pot. B would be 82 or 81, ect
Yes, you guys want more information in that you all want 100% potentials, just like they have in the NFL?
Only God knows what these players potentials are, not the NFL GMs.
But here, all coaches have God-like skills knowing all 8 pots, 4 days to draft therefore zero mistakes in this fantasyland.
Grades would be based on the players exact potential.
For example, A grade in SP for WR would mean he has 83 or 84 speed pot. B would be 82 or 81, ect
Yes, you guys want more information in that you all want 100% potentials, just like they have in the NFL?
Only God knows what these players potentials are, not the NFL GMs.
But here, all coaches have God-like skills knowing all 8 pots, 4 days to draft therefore zero mistakes in this fantasyland.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 5:52 pm
Re: Draft Idea
Rich-League Officer wrote:That's not true.
Grades would be based on the players exact potential.
For example, A grade in SP for WR would mean he has 83 or 84 speed pot. B would be 82 or 81, ect
Yes, you guys want more information in that you all want 100% potentials, just like they have in the NFL?
Only God knows what these players potentials are, not the NFL GMs.
But here, all coaches have God-like skills knowing all 8 pots, 4 days to draft therefore zero mistakes in this fantasyland.
I understand what you are trying to do but I just don't see a reason to do it. We have had the potentials open for how many seasons why change now.
-
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:16 pm
- Location: Gilbert, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Draft Idea
Because sometimes adding small complexity and randomness makes it more fun.
No, it's not necessary but neither was adding "physicals" but we did it anyway.
We did not need a podcast but we did it.
We did not need FNL but we did it.
Sometimes adding things improves on something that seems already good enough.
Obviously, if coaches are not interested that's fine.
But as I said last night, I find the drafts to be a bore.
Everyone has their perfectly crafted excel spreadsheets, with days to make the most perfect selection.
Half you guys have already mapped out their training camps for their career.
None of that is representative of the NFL on draft day.
No, it's not necessary but neither was adding "physicals" but we did it anyway.
We did not need a podcast but we did it.
We did not need FNL but we did it.
Sometimes adding things improves on something that seems already good enough.
Obviously, if coaches are not interested that's fine.
But as I said last night, I find the drafts to be a bore.
Everyone has their perfectly crafted excel spreadsheets, with days to make the most perfect selection.
Half you guys have already mapped out their training camps for their career.
None of that is representative of the NFL on draft day.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests