43W4 Trash Talk Thread

[Steve-LA Chargers]

I completely overhauled my preparation this season. I now randomly pick the minimum number of plays for each play category and let it ride.

Sarcasm aside, what I mean is that QB IN might not matter at all anymore because we have collectively created the best routes possible in FBPRO. It becomes a matter of them having accuracy (DI) and the line protecting them long enough to make the pass unhindered and the receiver executing the route.

[Steve-LA Chargers]

And if we look at the only QB starting in the league with a DI less than 82 that might struggle compared to all the other more 'accurate' QBs, it is this guy:

A QB1 8 Daniel Jones OK 7 0-0 0 80 79 81 96 71 87 92 81

And what is his current stat line?

Code: Select all

Name                 Yr  Att  Com   Pct    Yds  Avg  Lg  TD Int   Rtg Sks-Yds
14 Jones, Daniel NYG  7   99   59  59.6    811  8.2  50   4   5  78.3   7-38

He has my precious 87 EN, but also has that rare 81 DI. Those 5 INTs might be telling us that the most important rating for a QB is DI.

Not meaning to pick on your player, Shawn. Just theorizing.

[Mitch-Oilers]

@Steve - and yet, I believe there were 31 custom plays added to the play pool this week.

We need another play clensing in the offseason.

EX: We have 300 PM plays and only need 6 in a gameplan. There are a lot of duds and dupes across the board.

[Steve-LA Chargers]

There are a lot of duds and dupes across the board.

Which the better coaches clearly never use

[Barney - Vikings]

“Lock is an upgrade because of his higher AC. They are duplicates in every other way. Lock should start until Tua can catch up through more TCs. You're welcome, Barney.”

Thanks,Bro!

I am definitely in the camp that says WR ratings matter more than QB ratings. That doesn’t mean QB ratings don’t matter but I’m not sure 87 vs 84 EN is decisive.