PNFL

Ranking is based on potential ratings...

From an owners point of view, I wonder why the new trend the less few seasons of teams posting evaluations of the draftees. Teams lose leverage in trades and let others know where you think players fall during the draft. Seems we should keep our draft evals our own? Why give our competition anything at all? Just thinking out loud

@Jerry - for me, I was trying to create helpful content foe the newsletter and to help newer owners. However, I think I've provided enough tutorials. Everyone is on their own now. Ha!

Mitch-Chiefs wrote:@Jerry - for me, I was trying to create helpful content foe the newsletter and to help newer owners. However, I think I've provided enough tutorials. Everyone is on their own now. Ha!

As a person you made the stink about it when you did it. I agree with cost competitive advantage. I had a few first round picks and was counting on bad picks and reaches by other owners. That being said as a person who doesn't have a pick in the first 4 rounds. I am all for it and even considered when I am knocked out of the playoff race or out of the playoffs making a full 3 round mock draft.

I am in agreement with Mitch. I think enough tutorials and other things have been given on all topics. I think there could be a good case for holding information close to the vest. That being said I am all for owners following Dean's game plan. I could use more Dean's on my schedule.

@Dean
I am counting on you to beat Washington this week. Get out of the Draft file get into the game plan file. I want 1000s of sims. Teams have given you a blueprint beat him and don't make it close.

Nothing revealed here. Any team owner could have generated this list. The only thing not disclosed is how I calculated the number in the last column. If I had disclosed that, I suspect all 17 of would disagree with that and use different criteria to calculate your own numbers.

Also, the flaw in those numbers is the fact it is based on potentials only. Most you of know a 699 point WR that needs 20 points in TC is likely drafted later than a 695 point WR that already has 693 points.

There are a few players needing 20 points in TC on that list that will be viewed as long term projects and will fall in the draft.

You are revealing your order and how you value the list. I'm just asking as it has been several folks throwing out things. I'm just a everyone is the enemy when it comes to the draft.

Jerry-Redskins wrote:You are revealing your order and how you value the list. I'm just asking as it has been several folks throwing out things. I'm just a everyone is the enemy when it comes to the draft.

Amen In fact any information you give could lower the value of every pick in the draft except the first. That is why we all pick kickers and punters for 1st round picks.

That ranking is based on pots only, not actual ratings, and it does NOT mean that is how I rank those players on my draft board. As I wrote above, nothing revealed. You should all take your relaxatives.