43W4 Post Show comments
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2023 4:25 pm
Great show once again, guys!
Just want to mention that QB Finley was drafted by LA a while ago and then traded to the Jets who then traded him to New England.
There is one QB keeper in the play pool that does have QB2 and it was allowed by Charlie because it was considered a wildcat option kind of play with the QB rolling out wide (and thus rarely succeeding).
Just a thought. Considering we have two offensive play categories unused - PLM and PLL - there could be an argument to use these for QB2 plays. Rules can then be made to control when they can be used. Maybe PLM is for QB2 runs and PLL is for QB2 passes. I'm sure there are other ways with the current categories to make it possible to use QB2 too, but I'd suspect the commishes are likely against it as anything we come up with is counter to the purpose of the current substitution mandate %.
Just want to mention that QB Finley was drafted by LA a while ago and then traded to the Jets who then traded him to New England.
There is one QB keeper in the play pool that does have QB2 and it was allowed by Charlie because it was considered a wildcat option kind of play with the QB rolling out wide (and thus rarely succeeding).
Just a thought. Considering we have two offensive play categories unused - PLM and PLL - there could be an argument to use these for QB2 plays. Rules can then be made to control when they can be used. Maybe PLM is for QB2 runs and PLL is for QB2 passes. I'm sure there are other ways with the current categories to make it possible to use QB2 too, but I'd suspect the commishes are likely against it as anything we come up with is counter to the purpose of the current substitution mandate %.