PNFL

You have to make decision... Is having this player on my 53 man roster as a back-up, even though he has slightly lower ACTs, more damaging to my team than having him bid on by another team and losing him? I put guys on my PS all the time that may have slightly higher ACTs, but are not in my team lon...

Seeing the ratings and stats are interesting... The CBs definitely had much lower ACT and POT ratings. That would help increase QBRs. A few things I takeaway from these numbers: - Changing our QB ratings alone will not drastically impact QB performance - The increased CB SP, AC and AG ACT ratings li...

No aST over 94? Maybe we are placing too much emphasis on 95 or 96 ST. IN clearly doesn't matter that much like I have been saying. Young, Elway and Bledsoe with those high INs still had low QBRs? Maybe EN mattered more? or AG? or even HA? @Steve One thing to keep in mind is the ratings CBs, partic...

No aST over 94? Maybe we are placing too much emphasis on 95 or 96 ST. IN clearly doesn't matter that much like I have been saying. Young, Elway and Bledsoe with those high INs still had low QBRs? Maybe EN mattered more? or AG? or even HA? Or coaching @Justin It's never the coaches fault. Ha!

Shawn-Giants wrote:I vote No because you can already Fake using stop and waits, no need to utilize the fake logic, WR's with Max AG already leave DB's holding their tools by nature, no real need to utilize logic that will allow low AG WR's to Fake.

#DONTBEATOOL

Disagree. We did extensive testing to get INT's in line without overly hurting % percentage. No reason to revisit since we did the deep study in my opinion. People never consider the second order of effects. Lets also stop trying to change rules when some need to just learn to win in the construct ...

For those not on the group chat, yesterday we were discussing the pass short/pass medium issue. Dean made a great point saying we need to go back to the original PNFL ratings when QBs had a MAX of 99 IN and 90 DI. I agree, we should consider going back to the original PNFL ratings scale in 1998. Her...

10 to 20... Too many current PM plays have YPC under 10 yards with 60%+ comp%. That's a short pass... Spend some time in play editor and you will see this doesn't work. Completion percentages on PM plays will be rubbish. How does the play editor have anything to do with plays gaining less than 10 y...

I'll abstain...

However, everyone who votes for the "in-season" test is cool with it... until they see their team give up a TD because the defense froze during the play.

10 to 20...

Too many current PM plays have YPC under 10 yards with 60%+ comp%. That's a short pass...