Search found 1243 matches
- Sun May 19, 2024 1:11 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Draft Pool 2045
- Replies: 2
- Views: 24
Re: Draft Pool 2045
I think the opposite. Forces people to other positions and not making a mistake to fill a gap. It's more of an east button
- Sun Mar 31, 2024 5:43 am
- Forum: Trade Talk
- Topic: Washington Trade Bait
- Replies: 0
- Views: 556
Washington Trade Bait
Considering moving a mid round pick and some younger players for accomplished Vets at several positions with at least 2 years left around. Also willing to listen to 2045 draft pick offers. Take a look at some of these players. C Luke Fortner 2 (2 Year Contract) 66 65 70 96 64 88 93 94 67 66 70 97 65...
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 2:02 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
- Replies: 13
- Views: 725
Re: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
I have more hair and use something a little sturdier than a broom, but yes.
- Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:49 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
- Replies: 13
- Views: 725
Re: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
No more changes. No more changes.
Folks have too much time on their hands and should be game planning I think. I just want to play a few seasons with no rule changes. Tired of the constant churn.
Folks have too much time on their hands and should be game planning I think. I just want to play a few seasons with no rule changes. Tired of the constant churn.
- Mon Mar 25, 2024 2:16 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
- Replies: 13
- Views: 725
Re: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
Just pointing out two thing. First, that the actual guts of the software were set to the style of play in 1998. We can change rules around the periphery like roster management and lots of testing led us to where we are, but ultimately we have to accept we have worked to a decent place on the 25 year...
- Sun Mar 24, 2024 5:37 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
- Replies: 13
- Views: 725
Re: Getting us to use TEs more as receivers
It's just as much play calling. Ask the Eagles and TE Likely how they are doing. Tired of the constant want to change things around here. Lets enjoy the ride with a game whose software is designed around the 1998 game. Full competitive league. Sure seems to be in a good place to me.
- Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:17 pm
- Forum: Practice Squad Lists
- Topic: Washington PS *Processed*
- Replies: 0
- Views: 467
Washington PS *Processed*
Demote LB David Long 9
PRACTICE SQUAD:
WR David Sills 9
WR Derius Davis
WR Mack Karvonen
TE Sid Schlichter
C Luke Fortner
DE Justin Growel
DT Nathan Shepard 10
LB David Long 9
S Santo Kassner
PRACTICE SQUAD:
WR David Sills 9
WR Derius Davis
WR Mack Karvonen
TE Sid Schlichter
C Luke Fortner
DE Justin Growel
DT Nathan Shepard 10
LB David Long 9
S Santo Kassner
- Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:14 pm
- Forum: Free Agent Signings
- Topic: WR Ben Skowronek {Signed w/Redskins 1-Point}
- Replies: 0
- Views: 474
WR Ben Skowronek {Signed w/Redskins 1-Point}
Washington 1 point
- Sat Mar 16, 2024 6:05 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: PS rule #7 is crazy
- Replies: 9
- Views: 492
Re: PS rule #7 is crazy
I happen to agree with James on this one. I'd let people push their players to the practice squad the same as now, but they revert to a one year contract. I'd keep the bidding because I believe current PS players probably tell their current team, I'm gonna go this week unless you call me up. Whoever...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PS rule #7 is crazy
- Replies: 9
- Views: 492
Re: PS rule #7 is crazy
The issue is PS players should only be on a 1 year contract as they are week to week in the NFL. I personally feel PS players should lose their contract when placed on the PS and cost points to sign beyond 1 year, but it has been decided to let the original team keep the contract and if someone sign...