Search found 926 matches
- Sun Oct 12, 2025 7:58 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: PNFL Scout '47
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1654
Re: PNFL Scout '47
2047 Week #7 Winners and Losers! Selected Offensive Plays of the Week: Runs: DN28RM01 (RM) = 6 attempts; 55 yards for 9.2 yards per carry. - No Fumbles KC28swp3 (RM) = 6 attempts; 49 yards for 8.2 yards per carry. - No Fumbles OR47Powr (RM) = 8 attempts; 64 yards for 8.0 yards per carry. - No Fumbl...
- Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:19 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: DL Run/Pass Focused
- Replies: 3
- Views: 105
DL Run/Pass Focused
I would appreciate your assistance in clarifying the rules for defensive linemen as they relate to run- and pass-focused defensive strategies. We had a discussion, which I cannot find, so here is the issue. Unfortunately, I have accidentally ruled both ways regarding new Custom plays, and I want to...
- Sat Oct 04, 2025 7:29 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PNFL Scout '47
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1654
Re: PNFL Scout '47
2047 Week #6 Winners and Losers! Selected Offensive Plays of the Week: Runs: ORX8rmT2 (RM) = 5 attempts; 56 yards for 11.2 yards per carry. - No Fumbles MN22tctr (RM) = 5 attempts; 46 yards for 9.2 yards per carry. - Two Fumbles DN27RM01 (RM) = 8 attempts; 62 yards for 7.8 yards per carry. - No Fum...
- Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:58 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Byes & Bullets
- Replies: 16
- Views: 1461
Re: Byes & Bullets
Gentlemen, the discussion is over, and we should all be satisfied! Let's go back to high school for just a moment. How many people remember the Pythagorean Theorem (a squared + b squared = c squared)? If the QB is mid-field and throws a bullet midfield, that is fifteen yards. But if he throws to th...
- Tue Sep 30, 2025 12:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PNFL Scout '47
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1654
Re: PNFL Scout '47
2047 Week #5 Winners and Losers! Selected Offensive Plays of the Week: Runs: JJ32rmOp (RM) = 5 attempts; 35 yards for 7.0 yards per carry. - No Fumbles ATF41spr (RM) = 5 attempts; 35 yards for 7.0 yards per carry. - Two Fumbles NY42RM00 (RM) = 10 attempts; 64 yards for 6.4 yards per carry. - No Fum...
- Sat Sep 20, 2025 6:54 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PNFL Scout '47
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1654
Re: PNFL Scout '47
2047 Week #4 Winners and Losers! Selected Offensive Plays of the Week: Runs: DN27RMX3 (RM) = 5 attempts; 54 yards for 10.8 yards per carry. - No Fumbles DN28RM01 (RM) = 6 attempts; 54 yards for 9.0 yards per carry. - No Fumbles ATF22spr (RM) = 5 attempts; 44 yards for 8.8 yards per carry. - No Fumb...
- Thu Sep 18, 2025 1:24 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: SP ratings compared to the 2025 Draft Combine 40 yard dash
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1564
Re: SP ratings compared to the 2025 Draft Combine 40 yard dash
I have not read all these postings, but briefly you are spending a lot of time on an issue that does not need fixing. In brief, you have a solution, and you are looking for a problem! Two or more DL plays refer to "Down Linemen" not any other position playing the LOS. A Linebacker is just...
- Sun Sep 14, 2025 10:26 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: PNFL Scout '47
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1654
Re: PNFL Scout '47
2047 Week #3 Winners and Losers! Selected Offensive Plays of the Week: Runs: AT68Guns (RM) = 7 attempts; 58 yards for 8. 3 yards per carry. - No Fumbles; One TD DB10rmQ1 (RM) = 7 attempts; 56 yards for 8.0 yards per carry. - One Fumble OR48PwrO (RM) = 7 attempts; 55 yards for 7.9 yards per carry. -...
- Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:58 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: SP ratings compared to the 2025 Draft Combine 40 yard dash
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1564
Re: SP ratings compared to the 2025 Draft Combine 40 yard dash
Wider distribution of attributes is the road that we are on, and we are getting there. Changing attributes is not on the table.
- Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:52 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: SP ratings compared to the 2025 Draft Combine 40 yard dash
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1564
Re: SP ratings compared to the 2025 Draft Combine 40 yard dash
Hmmm! This is interesting stuff! I will keep an eye on this thread, as I will soon start the draft preparation process by position.