PNFL

Makes sense. Thank you

With > 5 minutes remaining in the half: 1. If I'm going for it on 4th down, it sounds like three categories with weight > 0 are needed, is this correct? 2. What about when punting or field goals are involved: Can I have two categories with a chance to punt, each with weight 1, and then use a single ...

I watched a bit, it seems like the game was allowing the clicking macro to change the playcall for the Bengals for some reason, like somehow it got into the wrong action / playcall mode for just this half? It’s always clicking on play group 14, and that just happens to be where GLP defenses are in ...

Are you guys sure that all of the situations were correct in the profile, and there was no category missing from the game plan? It feels like the game got into a funky state more than an issue with the PPP. And I think Dan used the same game plan in both halves.. Dan noticed that each time it happe...

Place CB Greg Newsom on IR
Promote S Dadrion Taylor-Demer from PS

G Lester Cotton
T Jalen Travis
T Charles Grant
DE Fadil Diggs
LB Marte Mapu - 4yr
LB C.J. Goetz
CB Greg Newsome (IR)
S Kolby Harvell-Peel - 6yr

Steve-Buffalo Bills wrote:If both of these are true, why shrink the pool?

Because every draft, ~150 players that aren't good enough to make any team in the league, and never will be good enough to make any team in the league, end up sitting in the free agent pool for 5 seasons.

There is no reason to shrink the pool. It only creates problems and solves nothing. There is plenty of room to shrink the pool without causing problems. Though I think dropping to 175 is going from one extreme to another. Shrinking saves Charlie from having to make a bunch of players nobody wants a...

Brian-Broncos wrote:Since we can extend contracts at any time (so the teams over the limit aren't out their points) the only plans I can see this thwarting would be plans to hoard points.

Bad wording. I didn't mean it to be condescending.

This is completely bonkers to me. Not at all worth the work to manage and for very little difference, especially when all of our backups are so closely ranked to the starters. Want more injuries? Just require larger spread of sub IN/OUT percentages. That should make stats more realistic too. Want m...

Wouldn't it be easier just to require a different sub % than to change everyone's EN? Plus, starters would be left in the game longer and would be the ones more likely to be injured. By lowering everyone's EN, backups play just as much as starters so injuries would be far more spread out.