PNFL

Field Goal/Punt/Run Clock are exempt from the 3 category rule. But, once you bring in another play type, you are required to use 3 even if one of them is Field Goal/Punt/Run Clock Can you clarify this in the rules since it only says " Punting and Field Goals need only one category." - the...

2. What about when punting or field goals are involved: Can I have two categories with a chance to punt, each with weight 1, and then use a single go-for-it category in the third slot with a weight of 10? This would be fine. They only need 1 category, but if you want to use more than 1 for strategy...

You were just deemed the Super Bowl favorite - no belly aching!

Disagree changing more old plays. We made the decision to grandfather those as is. The prior last minute changes will more impactful than it originally seemed. Lets just set the new % and leave everything else the same. The only issue in my opinion is the %. The rules are good otherwise Have to use...

Since we're on bye week, if anyone wants to check out the updated PNFL Draft Client, its here: http://pnfl.sportsontheweb.net/draftapp/ Improvements Draft Board * Added sorting players by multiple attributes (SP, HA, etc) via position * New link for War Room allowing teams to setup/manage their draf...

Not opposed, if I am understanding correctly. Not interested in being forced to immediately spend points acquired through trading or gambling during the season though. Points acquired through trading or gambling in the regular season would be immune. Would just need to get to the carryover limit be...

Not sure whether we're trying to emulate an NFL system because they use salary cap and we're doing points, but under their structure you can carry over 100% from one season to the next, so if 48 is allocated, then a max of 48 can be carried over to the next year. I don't see a problem with this and ...

So potential benefits of reducing EN? 1) more realistic injuries 2) more realistic penalties 3) more need for lower players to be used 4) more broken plays These are all areas of current PNFL deficiencies when it comes to NFL comparisons. Seems like they could potentially be improved with just this ...

I agree with the others that 128 is too small - many teams wouldn't even have a choice on what position to draft. I brought up 220, but looking at all the undrafted players from 2045, even that is too high. I personally like 194. That leaves 4.5 players/pos at the end of the draft - a little more b...

0 pts