Fake Proposal Vote

Fake Proposal Vote

Poll ended at Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:36 pm

Allow a Receiver to throw a Fake within 5-yards of another Receiver.
5
33%
No change in current rule.
10
67%
 
Total votes: 15

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Charlie-49ers » Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:36 pm

I will leave voting open for one day. If approved, plays submitted by Wednesday night will be released to all on Thursday.
Image

User avatar
Moxs - Patriots
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2020 11:46 am

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Moxs - Patriots » Tue Mar 12, 2024 2:11 pm

The thing I do not like at the moment is why are we talking about doing these changes NOW?
Why not 5 weeks ago.
I just submitted plays. No thought about new changes. Do i get to resubmit my custom plays afterwords?

I am still trying to get my ppp approved, that should be the focus.

User avatar
Charlie-49ers
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Anthem, AZ

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Charlie-49ers » Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:50 pm

BTW, I have all the proxy votes for the people that do not vote!
Image

User avatar
Tim-Colts
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun May 15, 2022 2:05 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Tim-Colts » Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:04 pm

I only voted no cause it should be considered and determined well in advance of week 1 not as PPP are due.

I don't like the rushed nature. Let's determine it for adoption next off-season.
#1 overall pick 2041, #1 overall pick 2042 => made the playoffs...

User avatar
Steve-LA Chargers
Posts: 1102
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:43 pm

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Steve-LA Chargers » Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:14 pm

I voted yes, but might need to add restrictions to get more buy-in.

For example, only the primary receiver (white) or timed pass recipient can 'throw a fake.' This ensures we aren't using another receiver to peel off defenders. Also, can't execute this fake within 5 yards of the LOS.
Los Angeles Chargers
2041 Super Bowl XLIV Champions
Former commish of the XFBS, XFL, and CCFL

User avatar
Shawn-Giants
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:27 pm

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Shawn-Giants » Wed Mar 13, 2024 12:42 pm

I vote No because you can already Fake using stop and waits, no need to utilize the fake logic, WR's with Max AG already leave DB's holding their tools by nature, no real need to utilize logic that will allow low AG WR's to Fake.
Image

User avatar
Mitch-Oilers
Posts: 1200
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:11 am

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Mitch-Oilers » Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:58 pm

Shawn-Giants wrote:I vote No because you can already Fake using stop and waits, no need to utilize the fake logic, WR's with Max AG already leave DB's holding their tools by nature, no real need to utilize logic that will allow low AG WR's to Fake.


#DONTBEATOOL
AFC West Champion 2038, 2039, 2041, 2043
AFC Champion 2043

User avatar
Matt-Jacksonville
Posts: 699
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 8:58 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Matt-Jacksonville » Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:48 pm

I'm not against trying it, but the timing couldn't be worse. This should have been implemented back when Charlie first brought it up. Not during week one.

User avatar
Moxs - Patriots
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2020 11:46 am

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Moxs - Patriots » Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:25 pm

Seem like the feeling is No Changes at this time.

Yet needs to be revisited next off-season.

User avatar
Matt-Jacksonville
Posts: 699
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 8:58 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: Fake Proposal Vote

Postby Matt-Jacksonville » Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:49 am

Moxs - Patriots wrote:Seem like the feeling is No Changes at this time.

Yet needs to be revisited next off-season.


I would say start discussion after week 16 that way we can have the whole offseason to work on new plays like this if we choose to do so.


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests