Correction on the pyth formula. It's actually this:
The formula is: PF to the 2.37 power / (PF to the 2.37 power + PA to the 2.37 power)
Search found 1110 matches
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:36 pm
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: PNFL Power Rankings
- Replies: 5
- Views: 288
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:33 pm
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: PNFL Power Rankings
- Replies: 5
- Views: 288
PNFL Power Rankings
As promised during the podcast, here is the Power Poll. When I ran the XFBS, I used this Power Poll as our BCS poll for seeding the playoff teams. Out of curiosity, I punched in the PNFL numbers to see what it would tell us. I know some of you will immediately be critics, but it worked perfectly for...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:12 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Change Suspension
- Replies: 5
- Views: 365
Re: Rule Change Suspension
LA is done having anything to do with rule changes after last season. Keep mind though that was really a clean up because we had conflicting rules and Charlie and I were trying to fix things only, not really change anything too much. I think the resulting Cheat Sheet for defensive plays has been muc...
- Wed Mar 13, 2024 3:26 pm
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: PNFL Ratings - We agree on
- Replies: 13
- Views: 558
Re: PNFL Ratings - We agree on
No aST over 94? Maybe we are placing too much emphasis on 95 or 96 ST.
IN clearly doesn't matter that much like I have been saying. Young, Elway and Bledsoe with those high INs still had low QBRs?
Maybe EN mattered more? or AG? or even HA?
IN clearly doesn't matter that much like I have been saying. Young, Elway and Bledsoe with those high INs still had low QBRs?
Maybe EN mattered more? or AG? or even HA?
- Wed Mar 13, 2024 3:13 pm
- Forum: Practice Squad Lists
- Topic: LA Chargers PS *Processed*
- Replies: 0
- Views: 170
LA Chargers PS *Processed*
QB Chandler (vet)
QB Robinson
HB Johnson
TE Axelson
C Myers (vet)
G Campbell (vet)
T McClendon
DT Matlock
LB Rodriguez
QB Robinson
HB Johnson
TE Axelson
C Myers (vet)
G Campbell (vet)
T McClendon
DT Matlock
LB Rodriguez
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:14 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Fake Proposal Vote
- Replies: 9
- Views: 492
Re: Fake Proposal Vote
I voted yes, but might need to add restrictions to get more buy-in.
For example, only the primary receiver (white) or timed pass recipient can 'throw a fake.' This ensures we aren't using another receiver to peel off defenders. Also, can't execute this fake within 5 yards of the LOS.
For example, only the primary receiver (white) or timed pass recipient can 'throw a fake.' This ensures we aren't using another receiver to peel off defenders. Also, can't execute this fake within 5 yards of the LOS.
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:13 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
- Replies: 23
- Views: 734
Re: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
Simple rule of thumb though: If no routes go 10 or more yards, it's pass short. Must have a route going more than 10 yards to be pass medium.
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
- Replies: 23
- Views: 734
Re: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
Gotta say. A lot of those drag plays were submitted as Medium because they go 6-10 yards. To me that's the benchmark. Can it consistently get 6 yards if PML or PMM when completed? Can it get 10 yards if it's PMR? These plays are meant to consistently get 6-10 yards, not huge gains. Similarly, PSL an...
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:35 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
- Replies: 23
- Views: 734
Re: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
@Charlie - At least require that the end point of the route must not be 0-5 yards from the LOS - must be beyond (not on or before) the line 5 yards from the LOS. Easy compromise for now. Baby steps.
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 11:32 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Opinion re:Throw a Fake
- Replies: 10
- Views: 486
Re: Rule Opinion re:Throw a Fake
How did this fail? We only have one strong 'No'. Charlie, you aren't going to get unanimous support.