Search found 1242 matches
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 2:32 pm
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: PNFL Ratings - We agree on
- Replies: 13
- Views: 422
Re: PNFL Ratings - We agree on
Rich or Charlie would have to remind me if I do not remember correctly, but we have not adjusted WR attributes in this time frame in relation to the QB change. We rarely do any attribute things since it is very easy to move things and mess others up.
- Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:34 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Change Suspension
- Replies: 5
- Views: 252
Rule Change Suspension
Lets get the sense of the league
- Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:23 am
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: PNFL Ratings - We agree on
- Replies: 13
- Views: 422
Re: PNFL Ratings - We agree on
Disagree. We did extensive testing to get INT's in line without overly hurting % percentage. No reason to revisit since we did the deep study in my opinion. People never consider the second order of effects. Lets also stop trying to change rules when some need to just learn to win in the construct w...
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:33 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Opinion re:Throw a Fake
- Replies: 10
- Views: 337
Re: Rule Opinion re:Throw a Fake
I hate doing a change in season and not testing and will vote no for that main reason. Just need Charlie to act quickly if needed.
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:31 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
- Replies: 23
- Views: 492
Re: Rule Opinion re:Pass Short/Medium
The zone and distance is to categorize the play for name and primary routes. There is nothing wrong with the 3rd, 4th, and 5th receivers running short or long. People seem to get tunnel vision on the zone yardage. The first two primary reads are in the zone to reflect the team looking for that level...
- Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:41 pm
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: Top 5 Players by Position
- Replies: 5
- Views: 291
Re: Top 5 Players by Position
Those dirty numbers look kinda shiny to me.
- Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:38 pm
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: Post Camp Rankings
- Replies: 14
- Views: 400
Re: Post Camp Rankings
You guys do know that Mitch knows the team and position things are entertainment and not exact right? He knows half the teams have no FB and teams have a million players at some positions. He's just putting out "relative" rankings for discussion. Relative rankings do still tell a story ove...
- Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:09 pm
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: Post Camp Rankings
- Replies: 14
- Views: 400
Re: Post Camp Rankings
Not to speak for Mitch, but I think you are misunderstanding his data. He does have the weighted analysis based on the actual stats. It is the base of everything else. He also does a rough order of magnitude look at talent by position relative to each other on the teams. Both are valuable on a playe...
- Sat Mar 09, 2024 6:19 am
- Forum: Trash Talk
- Topic: Post Camp Rankings
- Replies: 14
- Views: 400
Re: Post Camp Rankings
Rich and Mitch are ranking based on their perceived weights/importance of attributes at positions with modification based on positional weights. Mitch by his personal position importance and Rich I believe with NFL salary importance. You have two different experienced players weighting players that ...
- Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:26 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Tight Ends Utility
- Replies: 18
- Views: 514
Re: Tight Ends Utility
The software is 25 years old and the game was different. The algorithms are built on the game at that time. One change can begat another needed one and never create 2023 NFL with the silly rules that allow offenses to be too easy. The games in the PNFL are competitive and interesting. Everyone have ...